On 10/9/10 11:42 AM, Xuo wrote:
>
>>> * Point 4 : it seems to be the most widely used but it needs so
>>> executables
>>> on all clients. This is a big disadvantage.
>> Yes, there are some tradeoffs. You could also use smb as the xfer method -
>> with
>> the disadvantage of missing new files with old timestamps in incrementals.
> Hi,
>
> How can this happen ? If this file has an old timestamps, then it means
> that it was moved from a directory into the one which is saved. Then it
> is a new file, then it should be saved.
Using rsync, even locally with smb/cifs mounted targets will catch this. Using
smb or tar won't because they don't do a comparision against your existing tree
and have nothing to go on but the timestamps in incrementals.
--
Les Mikesell
[email protected]
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Beautiful is writing same markup. Internet Explorer 9 supports
standards for HTML5, CSS3, SVG 1.1, ECMAScript5, and DOM L2 & L3.
Spend less time writing and rewriting code and more time creating great
experiences on the web. Be a part of the beta today.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/beautyoftheweb
_______________________________________________
BackupPC-users mailing list
[email protected]
List: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
Wiki: http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/
