Le 14/01/2011 09:37, Sorin Srbu a écrit : > > My next question was going to be about filesystems. 8-) > > Ext3 has so far with 1.5TB worked fine and had decent performance, if not a > speed demon. Xfs isn't supported yet I think in CentOS. Zfs focuses mainly on > really big files IIRC. Ext4 would maybe have been a good choice, but isn't > supported in CentOS either if I'm not mistaken. > > I'd prefer sticking with CentOS and BPC, as both are relatively known now at > the IT-department, ie me. 8-) Any particular reason I should look into > Nexentastor? The Zfs?
Hi, Does anyone has tested or used Gluster and Ext4 to store the backup files? Gluster creates a NAS from a server cluster, servers can be used as Ext4 filesystem. Regards. -- ============================================== | FRÉDÉRIC MASSOT | | http://www.juliana-multimedia.com | | mailto:[email protected] | ===========================Debian=GNU/Linux=== ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Protect Your Site and Customers from Malware Attacks Learn about various malware tactics and how to avoid them. Understand malware threats, the impact they can have on your business, and how you can protect your company and customers by using code signing. http://p.sf.net/sfu/oracle-sfdevnl _______________________________________________ BackupPC-users mailing list [email protected] List: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users Wiki: http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/
