Michael Stowe wrote at about 11:57:42 -0500 on Tuesday, May 17, 2011:
> >
> > Has anyone tried using BackupPC and MooseFS (http://www.moosefs.org/)?
> >
>
> No, but it seems like a *really* bad idea -- the concept of slow, off-box,
> redundant storage isn't a really good fit with the concepts of pooling and
> linking.
>
> Since it's fuse-based, there's the possibility it doesn't support
> hard-linking at all, which would make it completely unfeasible. (I don't
> know, it's not obvious what it supports from the documentation.)
The first paragraph on the page linked by the OP says:
Symbolic links (file names pointing to target files, not necessarily
on MooseFS) and hard links (different names of files which refer to
the same data on MooseFS)
So at least it supports hard links...
Your points about speed may very well be true...
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Achieve unprecedented app performance and reliability
What every C/C++ and Fortran developer should know.
Learn how Intel has extended the reach of its next-generation tools
to help boost performance applications - inlcuding clusters.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devmay
_______________________________________________
BackupPC-users mailing list
BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net
List: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
Wiki: http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/
