Hi, Jeffrey J. Kosowsky wrote on 2011-05-18 02:41:15 -0400 [Re: [BackupPC-users] Best NAS device to run BackupPC ?]: > [...] > let's end this thread...
great idea, I second that! Timothy's point, as I understand it, was that if you *do* have buggy NFS implementations, you have the choice of either putting time into fixing that or putting time into implementing a different option (iSCSI, ATAoE), and that not everyone enjoys the challenge of hacking a proprietary NAS device. You do, and that's fine. I wouldn't, but I spend time on other topics where I *know* there's a simple solution or workaround readily available, but I prefer to go the complicated way - just for fun or for good reasons. Your experience seems to indicate that NAS devices occasionally *do* have buggy NFS implementations and other pitfalls, right? ;-) I believe many if not all options have been pointed out, so let's either find something we *really* disagree on or move on ... Regards, Holger ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ What Every C/C++ and Fortran developer Should Know! Read this article and learn how Intel has extended the reach of its next-generation tools to help Windows* and Linux* C/C++ and Fortran developers boost performance applications - including clusters. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devmay _______________________________________________ BackupPC-users mailing list BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net List: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users Wiki: http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/