On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 11:02 AM, Mauro Condarelli <mc5...@mclink.it> wrote: > Hi Everybody, > it occurred to me there may be legal pitfalls (particularly in the States, > but not only) concerning "Intellectual Property" of any contribution. > > I know several organizations (e.g.: Eclipse) require a declaration from each > contributor stating: > 1) he is transferring Copyright of each and all patches to the Project. > 2) no other party (i.e.: his employer) has any claim on his contributions. > I know because I had to go into some loops to have some contributions > accepted. > > Should we be concerned? > I know *noting* about USA Copyright laws (aside from the fact they're making > many "attorneys" rich). > Is there someone knowledgeable here on the list? > Should we seek advice? (where? github? FSF?) > > We should fix this ASAP, before the coder base enlarges. > > Please give advice.
Since the initial license is GPL v2, the only restriction is that any changes/additions must also be GPL or compatible (include source and not add additional restrictions). In some cases projects add a requirement to transfer ownership of contributions to the official version so that someone would have the authority to change the license on future versions if desired - but it may already be too late for that. -- Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Mobile security can be enabling, not merely restricting. Employees who bring their own devices (BYOD) to work are irked by the imposition of MDM restrictions. Mobile Device Manager Plus allows you to control only the apps on BYO-devices by containerizing them, leaving personal data untouched! https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/304595813;131938128;j _______________________________________________ BackupPC-users mailing list BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net List: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users Wiki: http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/