On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 1:11 PM, Stefan Peter <[email protected]>
wrote:
>
> There have been mentions of the infamous SCO trials. But there, the
> situation is different: SCO claims that vast amounts of their code has
> been lifted and transplanted in to the Linux kernel. And such claims can
> be made by anyone, against any project. This is just lawyers having a
> blast and investors gambling.
>
Yes, understood. We're just using SCO as the example that anyone (or any
company) can sue someone, even with little or no merit.
> I feel that this whole discussion is pointless and a real time sink. All
> the effort going into this discussion would better be spent by working
> on BackupPC and the infrastructure to support it. All I wanted to say is
> that CDAs may not be legally possible for all contributors and that it
> would require some institution which may have to be tightly controlled
> in order to mitigate the risk of loosing the control over the project.
>
Time sink yes. Pointless, maybe not.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mobile security can be enabling, not merely restricting. Employees who
bring their own devices (BYOD) to work are irked by the imposition of MDM
restrictions. Mobile Device Manager Plus allows you to control only the
apps on BYO-devices by containerizing them, leaving personal data untouched!
https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/304595813;131938128;j
_______________________________________________
BackupPC-users mailing list
[email protected]
List: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
Wiki: http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/
