On Fri, 27 Oct 2017 17:11:26 +0200 Gandalf Corvotempesta <gandalf.corvotempe...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm using ZFS, so checksumming is done by ZFS itself, is not an issue > for me to skip any data corruption check, as zfs does this > automatically ZFS is very good at this, but for data I'd like to have both belt and suspenders (note that there's still a pending important issue about rewriting or not when meeting a bad sector, it's mitigated if you're using mirrors (which you should), but with RAIDZ-n, it raises the possibility of data loss.) But from your other post (10x slower w/ chksum), I think there's no question that removing it is the way to go for your case. > What I would like is to keep load as low as possible on clients and > checksumming every file is slowing down everything As always in IT, the best compromise for your own case is always the best of all ;-) JY ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ BackupPC-users mailing list BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net List: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users Wiki: http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/
