Yet another sideline sitter here. However, here goes with a very questionable thought. Maybe BackupPC is the wrong tool for this particular directory/instance? Perhaps something like Amazon Glacier with Cryptomator is a wiser choice in this one scenario?
Thanks, Greg Harris On Feb 17, 2022, at 10:27 AM, backu...@kosowsky.org<mailto:backu...@kosowsky.org> wrote: G.W. Haywood via BackupPC-users wrote at about 13:24:26 +0000 on Thursday, February 17, 2022: Hi there, On Thu, 17 Feb 2022, brogeriofernandes wrote: I'm wondering if would be possible to run a command just after client transfers file data but before it's stored in backuppc pool. My idea is to do an image compression, like jpeg-xl lossless, instead of the standard zlib one. Have you considered using a compressing filesystem on the server? I think that is the best idea as: 1. It is transparent to BackupPC 2. You benefit from all the optimizations of the underlying file system 3. No new coding is needed 4. No need to create special compression cases for different file types 5. Compression is automagically multi-threaded and cached/backgrounded so as to minimally slow down the program (I never "feel" the overhead of compression on my btrfs/zsd file system). 5. It's essentially totally reliable It's particularly easy for a filesystem like btrfs... where you can use 'zstd' which is both fast and good compression. I would compare the speed and compression ratio of btrfs with 'zstd' with the speed and compression ratio of your raw lossless jpg compression. ... more bandwidth-friendly ... compression before transferring to server ... The data can be compressed on the client by the transfer tools during the transfer. This can be purely to reduce network load and it can be independent of any compression (perhaps by a different method) of the data when it is stored by the server. The compression algorithms for transfer and storage can be chosen for different reasons. Of course if it is required to perform multiple compression and/or decompression steps for each file, the server will have to handle an increased load. This can all be more or less transparent to BackupPC. -- 73, Ged. _______________________________________________ BackupPC-users mailing list BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net<mailto:BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net> List: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users Wiki: https://github.com/backuppc/backuppc/wiki Project: https://backuppc.github.io/backuppc/ _______________________________________________ BackupPC-users mailing list BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net<mailto:BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net> List: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users Wiki: https://github.com/backuppc/backuppc/wiki Project: https://backuppc.github.io/backuppc/
_______________________________________________ BackupPC-users mailing list BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net List: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users Wiki: https://github.com/backuppc/backuppc/wiki Project: https://backuppc.github.io/backuppc/
