On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 7:11 PM, Frank Sweetser <[email protected]> wrote: > John Drescher wrote: >> On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 7:06 PM, Frank Sweetser <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Dan Langille wrote: >>>> On Jan 22, 2009, at 6:54 PM, Kern Sibbald wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Thursday 22 January 2009 23:59:26 Dan Langille wrote: >>>>>> This sounds clever. Hard to do? >>>>>> >>>>> No, it is essentially the same a item 24 in the projects file. >>>>> since it was >>>>> 24 on the last vote, given the items above it, unfortunately we are >>>>> unlikely >>>>> to get to it any time soon, even though many of the items above it >>>>> have >>>>> already been completed for version 3.0.0 >>>> Is that the right number? 24? >>>> >>>> http://www.bacula.org/en/?page=projects >>>> >>>> Item 24: Add an override in Schedule for Pools based on backup types. >>> It looks like it's item 24 on the latest projects file: >>> >>> http://bacula.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/bacula/trunk/bacula/projects?view=markup >>> >>> Perhaps the projects link on the main page should be updated to point to >>> this >>> version instead? >>> >> >> Its 15 there: >> >> Item: 15 Multiple threads in file daemon for the same job >> >> John > > Strange, I see > > Item 15: Implement more Python events and functions --- Abandoned for > plugins > > and > > Item 24: Multiple threads in file daemon for the same job > > What revision does that page show you? And if it's anything other than 8084, > does this link show you the correct file? > > http://bacula.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/bacula/trunk/bacula/projects?revision=HEAD&view=markup > I meant 15 on the main page:
http://www.bacula.org/en/?page=projects John ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by: SourcForge Community SourceForge wants to tell your story. http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword _______________________________________________ Bacula-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-devel
