Hello,
On 21.10.2005 23:11, John Kodis wrote:
On Fri, Oct 21, 2005 at 09:29:04PM +0200, Arno Lehmann wrote:
I've seen that... I could work around that by using my older
bacula-sd.conf file - one without the autochanger resource. I supposte
that btape is simply not yet developed to know about the newer
configuration file format.
Yes, that would explain it. I was fooled by the section of the
"Testing Your Tape Drive With Bacula" web page that says that "If you
have an autochanger and it is configured, Bacula will automatically
use it."
Well, that's what you get for using development versions :-)
It looks like the guys writing the documentation just got a bit ahead
of the guys writing the btape code. Since I've verified that the tape
drives themselves pass the btape tests, I'll just proceed with setting
up Bacula and not worry about this test code failure.
After all, it's mainly only one guy...
Thanks for the suggestion. It saved me a potentially painful session
with gdb trying to figure out what was going wrong.
Arno
--
IT-Service Lehmann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Arno Lehmann http://www.its-lehmann.de
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads, discussions,
and more. http://solutions.newsforge.com/ibmarch.tmpl
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
