Ove Risberg wrote:
> What: I want to start multiple backup jobs on one client to get the
> fastest possible backup of my server but I do not want a
> complicated configuration or restore process.
> Why: Multiple concurrent backups of a large fileserver with many
> disks and controllers will be much faster.
I question this assumption. My experience is that the disk subsystem of
any fast client is VERY rarely the performance bottleneck in Bacula. I
doubt this will yield a performance increase unless your large server
also has a very fast network connection AND is being backed up to
multiple storage devices in parallel. So unless you have multiple
servers doing concurrent backups of different filesystems on the same
client, I doubt you'll gain much.
--
Phil Stracchino [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Renaissance Man, Unix generalist, Perl hacker
Mobile: 603-216-7037 Landline: 603-886-3518
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
