Ross Boylan wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 25, 2005 at 04:00:59PM -0500, Phil Stracchino wrote:
>>I suggest this could be accomplished with the addition of a single
>>optional Pool directive valid only for disk volumes:
>>
>>Delete Volume When Pruned = Yes
>>
>
> If I understand the manual correctly, when a volume is pruned the
> associated catalog entries for jobs and files are deleted. It seems
> to me there's some value in decoupling the lifetime of the volume and
> the lifetime of the catalog records. Perhaps not enough value to be
> worth the extra complication, but some value.
>
> Also, how would the proposed option and recycling interact? If Delete
> Volume When Pruned and Recycle are both yes, who wins?
Well, it wouldn't make sense to have both options enabled, true.
Personally, I'd make that generate a load-time error -- "Warning: Pool
resource 'Disk Pool' contains conflicting options 'Recycle Volumes' and
'Delete Volumes When Pruned'"
--
Phil Stracchino [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Renaissance Man, Unix generalist, Perl hacker
Mobile: 603-216-7037 Landline: 603-886-3518
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
