>>>>> On Thu, 12 Jan 2006 19:17:07 +0100, Kern Sibbald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:

  Kern> On Thursday 12 January 2006 18:37, Dimitri Puzin wrote:
  >> Hi all,
  >> 
  >> when configuring bacula sources like
  >> $ ./configure --prefix=/path/to/bacula/binaries ...
  >> then I'd expect the man directory to be set to ${prefix}/man, however it
  >> defaults to /usr/share/man. Is that wanted behavior?

  Kern> Yes, that is the desired behavior -- by definition because that is what 
it 
  Kern> does.  The problem is that the "standards" are "all over the place", 
  Kern> and ./configure is *very* hard to work with concerning things such as 
  Kern> --prefix, so Bacula prints a nice summary of where it will put 
everything, 
  Kern> and provides ./configure options for modifying all the paths ...

BTW, the configure --help implies that --mandir defaults to [PREFIX/man].

I've never seen a package where --prefix allows thing to escape...except when
it is a bug :-)

If the "share" is the problem, then how about defaulting to PREFIX/share/man?

__Martin


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems?  Stop!  Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the  web.  DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

Reply via email to