On Thu, 12 Jan 2006, Andrew Ford wrote:
Kern Sibbald wrote:
I appreciate your interest, but as you will soon learn, I'm not a
fan of DocBook [....]
I'll echo Kern's thoughts on DocBook. [....]
My LaTeX experience is minimal, and I don't intend to be a DocBook
apologist, so I can't really comment on your experiences. I've found
DocBook, esp. in conjunction with the XSL stylesheets produced by Norm
Walsh et al., to work quite well for screen-oriented documents.
Page-oriented publications (like O'Reilly stuff) or those with heavily
tabular material (like cookbooks) haven't been my concern.
The lack of polished editing tools wasn't really my concern either,
considering that most folks who use and know about bacula probably
do most of their text editing in vi or emacs anyway.
That said, I have no agenda. If DocBook isn't your cup o' tea, then
feel free to ignore it. :-)
--
Paul Heinlein <> [EMAIL PROTECTED] <> www.madboa.com
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
