Kern Sibbald wrote: > Unfortunately, Bacula is sufficiently demanding that it often brings out > driver problems that don't show up using most Unix tape utilities, which tend > to be rather "simple" minded. They either simply write() or read(). Bacula > uses quite a lot more features of the drive. >
That's very interesting. I've lost a certain degree of faith in the SCSI card I'm using; it's not particularly common so there's every possibility the driver hasn't had as much exercise as some of the more common SCSI card drivers. I'm wondering if it's worth replacing the SCSI card with something a little more commonplace - I'm thinking a reasonably sensible Adaptec card right now, maybe using the aic7xxx driver - has anyone had any experience of these? _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
