On Saturday 01 July 2006 09:39, Mindaugas wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Now in reports that Bacula sends after backup Rate is calculated simply
> dividing
> SD Bytes written by Elapsed time.
> But since I'm using data spooling and doing multiple backups at the same
> time this
> number means absolutely nothing.
>
> It would be much more useful to get another two numbers:
> - data spool rate. Which would indicate how fast data was received from
> FD to SD spool.
> - write to tape rate. How fast data was despooled to tape drive.
>
> Then first number would show network and spool drive performance and
> usage. Second one
> will show if my hardware is capable to feed tape drive fast enough that
> drive does not
> have to stop tape. Such stops/starts reduces not only backup speed but also
> tape life
> dramatically.
>
> I think I remember some thoughts from Kern about implementing this ;).
> Back from the end
> of 2004.
I don't have any problem implementing better statistics, but it is not on the
top of my personal priority list (nor what users voted on), so I am waiting
for a patch to arrive.
--
Best regards,
Kern
(">
/\
V_V
PS: Once version 1.40.0 is release, aside from continuing to fix bugs, I will
be concentrating my personal efforts on two things: 1. GUI interfaces 2.
Performance (including documentation on how to improve it).
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
