Hy Das anybody runs Bacula (1.38.9) on Sun Solaris (8, 9, 10)? I'm interested, how do you backup a consistent state of the System.
For Example I use fssnap for /, /var and /export/home witch are on a ufs-Filesystem. But I think it's slower backing up from the snapshot then from the real File. I think the Backup is very slow in general. bacula-dir and bacula-sd are running on a dedicated Sun on witch also the Cattalo-Database (PostgresSQL) are running. backing up a Solaris 8 running Oracle-DB takes my 6 and a half hours for 261GB that's about 11.4MB/s Details: 03-Nov 13:32 merkur-dir: Bacula 1.38.9 (02May06): 03-Nov-2006 13:32:37 JobId: 3930 Job: saturn.2006-11-02_21.00.02 Backup Level: Full Client: "saturn-fd" sparc-sun-solaris2.8,solaris,5.8 FileSet: "SaturnFull" 2006-01-13 20:05:32 Pool: "Backup" Storage: "Tandberg" Scheduled time: 02-Nov-2006 21:00:01 Start time: 03-Nov-2006 07:01:12 End time: 03-Nov-2006 13:32:37 Elapsed time: 6 hours 31 mins 25 secs Priority: 21 FD Files Written: 446,213 SD Files Written: 446,213 FD Bytes Written: 261,207,880,851 (261.2 GB) SD Bytes Written: 261,283,897,816 (261.2 GB) Rate: 11122.3 KB/s Software Compression: None Volume name(s): BACKUP-2005-12-05_45|BACKUP-2006-11-03_3930 Volume Session Id: 1846 Volume Session Time: 1148901284 Last Volume Bytes: 159,174,938,006 (159.1 GB) Non-fatal FD errors: 0 SD Errors: 0 FD termination status: OK SD termination status: OK Termination: Backup OK On the other Hand I back up an Application-Server running Solaris 10 takes my 1 hours 19 minutes for about 19GB. That's about 4MB/s Details: 03-Nov 16:45 merkur-dir: Bacula 1.38.9 (02May06): 03-Nov-2006 16:45:58 JobId: 3939 Job: neptun.2006-11-03_15.25.10 Backup Level: Full Client: "neptun-fd" sparc-sun-solaris2.10,solaris,5.10 FileSet: "NeptunFull" 2005-12-07 21:04:30 Pool: "Backup" Storage: "Tandberg" Scheduled time: 03-Nov-2006 15:25:01 Start time: 03-Nov-2006 15:26:22 End time: 03-Nov-2006 16:45:58 Elapsed time: 1 hour 19 mins 36 secs Priority: 40 FD Files Written: 441,549 SD Files Written: 441,549 FD Bytes Written: 18,816,988,341 (18.81 GB) SD Bytes Written: 18,896,666,176 (18.89 GB) Rate: 3939.9 KB/s Software Compression: None Volume name(s): BACKUP-2006-11-03_3930 Volume Session Id: 1848 Volume Session Time: 1148901284 Last Volume Bytes: 229,313,864,627 (229.3 GB) Non-fatal FD errors: 0 SD Errors: 0 FD termination status: OK SD termination status: OK Termination: Backup OK So where is the Difference? What's going wrong that it takes so long? I'm graceful for any hint. Thanks for your reply Berner Martin ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
