Hello Arno,

Thanks for your comments. Please see below for my responses:

On Saturday 04 November 2006 22:42, Arno Lehmann wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 11/4/2006 1:46 PM, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> > Hello,                                     1 November 2006
> > 
> > This contents of this email is for discussion on the Bacula email
> > list, but not yet a topic for "publication".
> 
> Quite hard, regarding the number of list readers and open mailing list 
> archives. But then, this is not really vital, and we're only needing 
> confidentiality for a few weeks...

Yes, this is not a "secret" list so the information will go out, but hopefully 
no one will post it to a public news site until after their announcement (in 
the next week if I am not mistaken).

> 
> > As you are probably aware, I am planning certain reorganizations
> > of the Bacula project for a number of reasons. ...
> Yes.
> > Several months ago, I met with Georg Greve, the President of
> > the Free Software Foundation Europe (FSFE). I learned that
> > he was in the process of creating the FSFE Freedom Task Force
> > to work with projects that would like to enter into a fiduciary
> > license agreement with the FSFE with the objective to offload
> > the adminstrative (legal) needs of the project to the FSFE
> > while keeping the project adminstration unchanged.  The
> > Freedom Task Force has been in operation since the beginning
> > of October with Shane Coughlan heading it up.
> > 
> > Probably the best explaination of their policy as it relates to
> > Bacula is described in the "FSFE Fiduciary Licensing Policy",
> > which I have attached to this email in pdf format.
> > 
> > A short summary of what I am proposing is:
> > 1. Transfer the Bacula copyright to the FSFE.
> > 2. There will be no change in the license, which is defined
> >    in the LICENSE file -- only the copyright holder will
> >    be changed.
> > 3. FSFE will look after the legal matters of maintaining and,
> >    if necessary, defending the license.
> > 4. Aside from the copyright assignments for important
> >    contributions, there will be no other changes to the
> >    project resulting from the copyright transfer.
> > 5. The final transfer of the copyright will occur on or
> >    shortly after the 15th of November and will apply to the
> >    next released version.
> > 6. The official announcement of the formation of the FSFE
> >    Freedom Task Force, and that Bacula will particpate
> >    in their Fiduciary Licensing will be made at the end
> >    of November.
> 
> Sounds reasonable. I understand that this is about what you - and 
> probably many others - want, and it keeps you from setting op an 
> appropriate organization yourself. The FSFE gets their project going 
> with a renownded open-source project.
> 
> Looks like a win-win situation :-)

Yes, that is how I see it too.

> 
> > My belief is that this copyright transfer will be beneficial
> > to the project in many respects: assure that the source
> > remains Free Software, ensure that the source is not tied
> > to any single person, off load most of the legal tasks,
> 
> That last one is quite important to me.
> 
> > ...
> > 
> > If any of you have concerns, comments, or questions, please
> > do not hesitate to voice them now, either on the Bacula email
> > lists or directly to me.
> 
> I always have a hard time working through this (semi-)legal stuff, so I 
> guess others may find important points.
> 
> One regulation I don't especialy like, though, is the reference to the 
> GPL in "the current version". While I personally like the GPL V. 2, I 
> see some possible problems with the upcoming, new version.
> 
> Admittedly, I didn't follow the discussion very close, but as far as I 
> understand there are some things planned I don't think right. For that 
> reason I would prefer having Bacula under a GPL verson 2. YMMV, obviously.

The LICENSE will not be changed, only the copyright holder, so Bacula will 
continue to be distributed under GPL version 2 + a few additions that are 
specified in the LICENSE file.  When GPL version 3 is released, we'll take a 
look at whether or not we want to use it (with input from Bacula users, of 
course).

> 
> > I will take all comments
> > and concerns into consideration and attempt to answer all the
> > questions. Since I am on vacation and my Internet access is
> > very limited, some or all my responses may be delayed until
> > after my return on the 10th of November.
> 
> Well, enjoy the remains of your holidays!

Thanks. I enjoyed them a lot. I'm back home, but will need a few days to 
recuperate and re-adjust to the cool weather ... :-)

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

Reply via email to