We once used ftp -v to send files over the problematic connection.  

This will give you statistics on the throughput.  Run it in each
direction between the servers.  If one direction only gets about
7-10mbps, then you may have a mismatch of duplex and/or speed settings.

On Tue, 2007-02-06 at 17:56 -0500, Ryan Novosielski wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> MaxxAtWork wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > On 1/23/07, *Gabriele Bulfon* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
> > 
> >     Do you think that the switch may setup its port in half-duplex even
> >     if the x86 card says it's full-duplex?
> > 
> > 
> > It's rare but possible.
> > 
> >     If you think this may happen, is there any software tool that would
> >     let me verify if the connection between two machines connected by
> >     the same switch is running in full-duplex?
> > 
> > 
> > None that I know.
> > Only reliable way is to check directly from the switch, either logging
> > on the switch management interface, or checking the LED for the port
> > where your server is plugged. Modern switches indicate with a different
> > blink/light the speed/duplex/activity of the port.
> > 
> > Anyway, the fact that already netio was giving good results make me
> > think that you probably don't have mismatches on the physical ethernet.
> 
> Best way to check for a duplex mismatch, IMO, on UNIX/Linux (similar
> command and similar output on most *nix):
> 
> $ netstat -ian (or equivalent)
> Name  Mtu  Net/Dest      Address        Ipkts  Ierrs Opkts  Oerrs Collis
> Queue
> lo0   8232 127.0.0.0     127.0.0.1      37305  0     37305  0     0
>  0
> bge0  1500 130.219.34.0  130.219.34.167 543932 0     212934 0     0
>  0
> 
> ...if I had a problem here, I would very likely see a nonzero number of
> Ierrs or Oerrs, and possibly also Collis (when I should never see
> collisions on a switched network, really, with very few exceptions).
> I've had problems like this also due to below-spec cabling, but most
> frequently it's duplex.
> 
> - --
>  ---- _  _ _  _ ___  _  _  _
>  |Y#| |  | |\/| |  \ |\ |  | |Ryan Novosielski - Systems Programmer III
>  |$&| |__| |  | |__/ | \| _| |[EMAIL PROTECTED] - 973/972.0922 (2-0922)
>  \__/ Univ. of Med. and Dent.|IST/AST - NJMS Medical Science Bldg - C630
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (MingW32)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
> 
> iD8DBQFFyQeZmb+gadEcsb4RAl/dAJkB71+7OMFWHam3fBPpUPSh7SpViwCaAwsz
> +URyRq5qucK65XyEac4ZNEM=
> =FFE9
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
> Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier.
> Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
> http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
> _______________________________________________
> Bacula-users mailing list
> Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier.
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

Reply via email to