On Friday 16 February 2007 20:58, Ryan Novosielski wrote: > Kern Sibbald wrote: > > On Friday 16 February 2007 18:23, Ryan Novosielski wrote: > >> Kern Sibbald wrote: > >>> On Wednesday 14 February 2007 15:40, Gavin Conway wrote: > >>>> Martin Simmons wrote: > >>>>>> Hope this helps someone > >>>>> > >>>>> That file is generated by configure. Does rerunning configure break > >>>>> it again? What is on the broken line? > >>>>> > >>>>> __Martin > >>>> > >>>> Running configure does break it yes. The line looks like this; > >>>> > >>>> from ./src/host.h > >>>> #define HOST_OS "i686-pc-linux-gnu" > >>>> #define DISTNAME "debian" > >>>> #define DISTVER "ubuntu 5.10 > >>>> testing/unstable" > >>>> > >>>> Updated to look like; > >>>> > >>>> from ./src/host.h > >>>> #define HOST_OS "i686-pc-linux-gnu" > >>>> #define DISTNAME "debian" > >>>> #define DISTVER "" > >>> > >>> It looks like Ubuntu has broken the /etc/debian_version file or someone > >>> (you) edited it and added an inappropriate cr or lf. Could you send me > >>> a copy of that file as an attachment? > >> > >> My debian_version file from 6.10 just says "testing/unstable" with no > >> new line. > > > > Great, but you did not respond in the way I requested. > > I'm also not the same guy, but if you'd like me to do that, sure, why > not? ;)
Oh, sorry. The fact that you were not the reporter probably also explains why your debian_version file looks perfectly normal. Strange there is no version number, but that shouldn't hurt anything. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
