Are you running an antivirus scan?

I ran into a problem a few years ago where a certain antivirus product
was modifying the dates on files..  

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ridley
Sent: Friday, March 30, 2007 1:53 PM
To: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Incremental is really a full on FC6


What you've said makes sense to me too, but when I check the logs, it
shows that the files that were saved were compressed. Here's the full
log for the incremental:

29-Mar 23:05 backup-dir: Start Backup JobId 4,
Job=gandalf.2007-03-29_23.05.00
29-Mar 23:05 backup-sd: Volume "Vol-0002" previously written, moving to
end of data.
29-Mar 23:25 backup-sd: User defined maximum volume capacity
21,474,836,480 exceeded on device "File" (/tmp).
29-Mar 23:25 backup-sd: End of medium on Volume "Vol-0002"
Bytes=21,474,832,835 Blocks=332,882 at 29-Mar-2007 23:25.
29-Mar 23:25 backup-dir: Created new Volume "Vol-0003" in catalog.
29-Mar 23:25 backup-sd: Labeled new Volume "Vol-0003" on device
"File" (/tmp).
29-Mar 23:25 backup-sd: Wrote label to prelabeled Volume "Vol-0003" on
device "File" (/tmp)
29-Mar 23:25 backup-sd: New volume "Vol-0003" mounted on device
"File" (/tmp) at 29-Mar-2007 23:25.
30-Mar 00:08 backup-sd: User defined maximum volume capacity
21,474,836,480 exceeded on device "File" (/tmp).
30-Mar 00:08 backup-sd: End of medium on Volume "Vol-0003"
Bytes=21,474,818,876 Blocks=332,881 at 30-Mar-2007 00:08.
30-Mar 00:08 backup-dir: Created new Volume "Vol-0004" in catalog.
30-Mar 00:08 backup-sd: Labeled new Volume "Vol-0004" on device
"File" (/tmp).
30-Mar 00:08 backup-sd: Wrote label to prelabeled Volume "Vol-0004" on
device "File" (/tmp)
30-Mar 00:08 backup-sd: New volume "Vol-0004" mounted on device
"File" (/tmp) at 30-Mar-2007 00:08.
30-Mar 00:14 backup-sd: Job write elapsed time = 01:09:35, Transfer rate
= 7.647 M bytes/second
30-Mar 00:14 backup-dir: Bacula 2.0.3 (06Mar07): 30-Mar-2007 00:14:40
  JobId:                  4
  Job:                    gandalf.2007-03-29_23.05.00
  Backup Level:           Incremental, since=2007-03-29 14:05:18
  Client:                 "gandalf" 2.0.3 (06Mar07)
i686-redhat-linux-gnu,redhat,(Zod)
  FileSet:                "Home Set" 2007-03-29 11:54:17
  Pool:                   "Default" (From Job resource)
  Storage:                "File" (From Job resource)
  Scheduled time:         29-Mar-2007 23:05:00
  Start time:             29-Mar-2007 23:05:03
  End time:               30-Mar-2007 00:14:40
  Elapsed time:           1 hour 9 mins 37 secs
  Priority:               10
  FD Files Written:       38,621
  SD Files Written:       38,621
  FD Bytes Written:       31,923,730,782 (31.92 GB)
  SD Bytes Written:       31,930,104,420 (31.93 GB)
  Rate:                   7642.7 KB/s
  Software Compression:   7.8 %
  VSS:                    no
  Encryption:             no
  Volume name(s):         Vol-0002|Vol-0003|Vol-0004
  Volume Session Id:      4
  Volume Session Time:    1175188894
  Last Volume Bytes:      1,040,824,645 (1.040 GB)
  Non-fatal FD errors:    0
  SD Errors:              0
  FD termination status:  OK
  SD termination status:  OK
  Termination:            Backup OK

30-Mar 00:14 backup-dir: Begin pruning Jobs.
30-Mar 00:14 backup-dir: No Jobs found to prune.
30-Mar 00:14 backup-dir: Begin pruning Files.
30-Mar 00:14 backup-dir: No Files found to prune.
30-Mar 00:14 backup-dir: End auto prune.

But the real problem is why the system is requiring a full backup even
though it says it's an incremental. As far as I can tell, every single
file was backed up on the incremental which tells me that something in
FC6 is modifying something that Bacula looks at. I should note that when
I was setting the configuration files up, I simply backed up /etc and
the full and incremental backups worked as expected.

In this situation, I manually ran the job after modifying the bacula-dir
file to make sure it would work. I then let the system do an automatic
backup last night and was suprized that over 30GB of data were backed
up. I'm gonna run out of disk space in a hurry at this rate :-)


On Fri, 2007-03-30 at 14:04 +0200, Marc Schiffbauer wrote:
> ...
> Not really about your Problem:
> 
> If I understand the docs correctly, your Options "signature",
> and "compression" do *not* apply to your files, but instead to your
> excluded files only, which makes no sense.
> 
> I think yout have to add seperate 
> 
> Options {
>   signature = MD5
>   compression = GZIP
> }
> 
> before the current one.
> 
> Kern ist this right what I say?
> 
> 
> About your Problem: Are you really sure that attributes of the files
> or something like that have changed for example?
> 
> -Marc


------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDE
V
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

Reply via email to