Ralf Gross schrieb:
> > I can just tell you that I have nearly the same problem on one AIX4 
> > server (verify is ok on all linux and windows-servers here). But my 
> > errormessage is: 'SHA1 digest differs' or 'MD5 digest differs' (I tried 
> > both). I restored such a file and made a diff but the file does not differ.
> 
> I had some problems in setting up the verify jobs. But I thought that
> the config is ok now. Maybe I'm still missing something, but if the
> right jobid is choosen for comparison and the checksums are different,
> what else could be wrong? A VolumeToCatalog verify job compares the
> checksums on tape to the checksums in the catalog.

I found the problem (after opening a bug). The client with the
different checksums is an i386 machine, the one without differnt
checksums is amd64 like the bacula-dir. As test I compiled bacula-fd
on my desktop machine (i386) and got no errors. Next I checked the
bacula-fd version on the first i386 machine. It was 1.38.5. After
installing 2.0.3 on this machine I get no different checksums anymore. 

So backing up a 1.38.5 client with an 2.0.3 dir works, but the
checksums are different.

Ralf

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

Reply via email to