On Friday 12 October 2007 12:25, Dan Langille wrote: > On 12 Oct 2007 at 12:19, Silver Salonen wrote: > > > On Friday 12 October 2007 12:13, Dan Langille wrote: > > > On 12 Oct 2007 at 9:14, Silver Salonen wrote: > > > > > > > Hi! > > > > > > > > Is there a reason why wx-console should use WX 2.4? Every time I > > > > start upgrading bacula-client, I just set "USE_WX=2.8" in > > > > bacula-server's Makefile and it builds and works perfectly. I've > > > > also tried compiling it with 2.6 and there wasn't any problem with > > > > it neither. > > > > > > > > So is the 2.4 really necessary there or would the WX-defaults > > > > suffice? > > > > > > No idea. :) That predates me I believe. > > > > Maybe so :) > > > > But what do you think of removing the flag? > > If it works, no problem. I suggest asking on the FreeBSD channels > too. And waiting a bit here to see what others say.
Well, it seems noone has anything to say against it :) >From FreeBSD channel I got the answer: ===== If it works with wxWidgets 2.8, please test it with 2.6 and then you can set USE_WX to "2.4+", which will use 2.8 by default (at least 2.4/2.6 is installed but not 2.8). Then if all went fine submit a PR with the patch. ===== I tried it with 2.6 too, so I think the WX version can be set to "2.4+" then. -- Silver ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
