> On Wed, 5 Dec 2007, Martin Simmons wrote: > >> If that is OK, then I suggest running the SD with debug level 200, which >> might give us a clue where the error occurs. > > So far I have been unable to get it to fail using -d200, while it does > fail if I don't specify a debug level. Maybe there is a timing issue. I'll > keep trying. > > Steve
Strangely, it has also not failed for me at all since I have had debugging turned up. I will continue to keep debugging high over the next few days and see if it fails at all. --Marc > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > SF.Net email is sponsored by: > Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. > It's the best place to buy or sell services for > just about anything Open Source. > http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php > _______________________________________________ > Bacula-users mailing list > Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users > > !DSPAM:1,475ac815206871589165409! > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
