I am still having trouble understanding why my new bacula is slower than 
my old one.
If anyone can help I would appreciate it.

Also
1) Are the messages in "Bacula-users" archived anywhere? In case there 
has been a discussion about how to make it faster.
2) Are there any hidden nooks in the manual that I need to look at?
Basically my old server with 2.0.2 can do 4MB/sec for a test windows client
and my new server less than 1MB/sec

Both with MySQL and identical cpus
and the disks on the new server are faster.


Bill Szkotnicki wrote:
> I have found that the newest version of bacula which I have compiled 
> here to be slower when backing up a windows client.
> The installation is on a fedora 8 linux (x86_64) opteron cpu.
> Previously on another similar and slower fedora machine I was using 
> bacula version 2.0.2
> and the speed achieved for backing up a windows client over our network 
> was about 900KB/sec
> and now with the newest version ( 2.2.7 )  it seems to be only about 
> half of that ( ~ 450KB/sec )
>
> Can anyone suggest why and how one might improve the speed?
>
> The networking is the same and the storage is "File" based.
> and the IO rate into storage should be very fast. I have benchmarked that.
>
>
> Thanks
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
> _______________________________________________
> Bacula-users mailing list
> Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
>
>   


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

Reply via email to