I am still having trouble understanding why my new bacula is slower than my old one. If anyone can help I would appreciate it.
Also 1) Are the messages in "Bacula-users" archived anywhere? In case there has been a discussion about how to make it faster. 2) Are there any hidden nooks in the manual that I need to look at? Basically my old server with 2.0.2 can do 4MB/sec for a test windows client and my new server less than 1MB/sec Both with MySQL and identical cpus and the disks on the new server are faster. Bill Szkotnicki wrote: > I have found that the newest version of bacula which I have compiled > here to be slower when backing up a windows client. > The installation is on a fedora 8 linux (x86_64) opteron cpu. > Previously on another similar and slower fedora machine I was using > bacula version 2.0.2 > and the speed achieved for backing up a windows client over our network > was about 900KB/sec > and now with the newest version ( 2.2.7 ) it seems to be only about > half of that ( ~ 450KB/sec ) > > Can anyone suggest why and how one might improve the speed? > > The networking is the same and the storage is "File" based. > and the IO rate into storage should be very fast. I have benchmarked that. > > > Thanks > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > _______________________________________________ > Bacula-users mailing list > Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users