On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 11:39 AM, John Drescher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 11:06 AM, Kjetil Torgrim Homme > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Marc Richter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >>> Further, I want to know, why bacula recycles Volumes (which destroys >>> data) instead of creating new ones and if this is a Bug which should >>> be reported. >> >> I believe this is intended behaviour, and it's the behaviour I want. >> after all, when I tell Bacula I want to keep that backup for 180 days, >> that's what I actually mean, and I don't want Bacula to start using a >> fresh tape when an old tape can be recycled instead. (Note, Bacula >> should only recycle media which is present and available without human >> interaction.) >> > > No, this is definitely not intended behavior. Bacula is supposed to > protect media for how ever long you specify in your volume retention > period. > > John >
-- John M. Drescher ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
