Dear Bacula Users,
A wish-list, and a couple of small questions:
a) When you give bscan a list of tapes with -V, it works its way through
them one by one. But if it hits an error on one of the tapes, it gives up
and throws away ALL of the previously scanned tapes. ie. nothing gets
written into the catalog. Could it update the catalog: at a sensible
place in each tape; at the end of each job; or update with what it has
found to be good so far, at least on the previous good tapes, to mitigate
this? ie. save you from having to re-scan the previous dozen tapes again.
b) I notice that in version 2.4.2, bscan -V tape1|tape2|etc... now manages
to unload the tape it has finished, which is a nice step forward. Is it
likely that it will one day load the next one too?
c) The docs on www.bacula.org mention problems with bscanning across tape
boundaries:
"If you do not specify all necessary Volumes on a single bscan command,
bscan will not be able to correctly restore the records that span two
volumes. In other words, it is much better to specify two or three volumes
on a single bscan command rather than run bscan two or three times, each
with a single volume."
Is this still accurate? I spent some time experimenting with bscan, and
from what I could tell bscanning an individual volume seemed to be
problem-free. If it is still true, that could also relate to a) above.
Thanks
Glen
--
Glen Davison [EMAIL PROTECTED]
SIRCA Pty Ltd Ph (02) 9236 9133
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is Sponsored by MIX09, March 18-20, 2009 in Las Vegas, Nevada.
The future of the web can't happen without you. Join us at MIX09 to help
pave the way to the Next Web now. Learn more and register at
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;208669438;13503038;i?http://2009.visitmix.com/
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
