Five years ago. I am sure Netbackup has progressed in those times. No one likes to dish out money to expensive software, but typically sturdy dependable products come at a price. Bacula is not a horrible product, but it has bugs in it. Bugs any serious company will probably not. In my opinion, it needs to be taken out of the open source community, closed sourced, and then have some highly paid engineers stamp the bugs.
-----Original Message----- From: John Drescher [mailto:dresche...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2009 3:14 PM To: Steve Handy; bacula-users Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Never Mind - Given up on Bacula > You get what you pay for!!!! > I moved to bacula nearly 5 years ago because veritas had extremely poor support and used extortion licensing tactics. Since then, I have backed up 30TB+ with bacula and had very little problems. That is significantly less than I had with backup executive. And the support (and documentation) are way better with bacula than that product. John ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San Francisco, CA -OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the Enterprise -Strategies to boost innovation and cut costs with open source participation -Receive a $600 discount off the registration fee with the source code: SFAD http://p.sf.net/sfu/XcvMzF8H _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
