On 04/17/2009 08:27, Olivier Delestre wrote: > Hello, > > A bug in bacula or misuse, I do not know. > Let me explain. > > I have a folder 1 that is saved. I have a folder 2 that is not. > The directories are on the same partition. > > Execution of a total folder 1 saved in whole > Moving a file to the folder 2 to folder 1. > Execution of an incremental, folder 1 is saved without the moving file > which is in the folder 1. > > Bacula uses the ctime, mtime only? > Is it not a problem of bacula or a misuse or (option)? > I do not know if this comment v3.0.0 rule. And this is only valid for > Windows clients ... easy to reproduce and if you have an explain ? > > http://www.bacula.org/en/rel-manual/Current_State_Bacula.html#SECTION00530000000000000000
Note the third bullet point. Apparently it still hasn't been addressed in v3.0.0. It seems easy enough to check whether a file has been backed up, but with file records having a separate retention time, it could be possible for an incremental backup to have no file records to check - just a timestamp of the last backup. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Stay on top of everything new and different, both inside and around Java (TM) technology - register by April 22, and save $200 on the JavaOne (SM) conference, June 2-5, 2009, San Francisco. 300 plus technical and hands-on sessions. Register today. Use priority code J9JMT32. http://p.sf.net/sfu/p _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users