On 04/07/10 00:54, Craig Ringer wrote:
> Yeah, that works ... when you only need to control pools based on job level.
>
> My problem is that sometimes I need to control other job attibutes, such
> as spooling, by job level.
>
> The mechanism just needs to be generalised a little, so your above
> example becomes:
>
>
> JobDefs {
> Name = Backup
> Type = Backup
> Level = Full
> Full {
> Pool = Full-Tape
> }
> Differential {
> Pool = Diff-Disk
> }
> Incremental {
> Pool = Incr-Disk
> }
> Schedule = "Monthly Rotation"
> [...]
> }
>
> ... or something like that, so other things may be overridden based on
> level.
This is a good suggestion, I think. I'd go ahead and write it up and
submit it. :)
--
Phil Stracchino, CDK#2 DoD#299792458 ICBM: 43.5607, -71.355
[email protected] [email protected] [email protected]
Renaissance Man, Unix ronin, Perl hacker, Free Stater
It's not the years, it's the mileage.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
