On Fri, April 9, 2010 05:09, Richard Scobie wrote:
[snip]
> You may find the XFS mount directive, "filestreams" of benefit here.
And using the 64-bit XFS will also better[1] than the standard 32-bit XFS.
Or the hybrid 32-bit XFS using 64-bit layout rules. (Damn, I only left
SGI at the end of 2008 and I've already forgotten all the stuff I used to
know about the inner machinations of XFS!! (I wasn't an XFS developer, I
started on CXFS and ended up in QA for the NAS/CXFS/XFS stuff))
And, in re ZFS, there is no "posix_fallocate" equivalent in S10 (that I
can find). There may be one in OpenSolaris, but I dunno.
Cheers,
Gary B-)
1 - Oh, so, so, so much better than the pathetically choked whimpering
little rodent that is 32-bit XFS. Switching to the 64-bit layout as the
default was prevented because the Linux "stat" system call could not
safely handle 64-bit inodes. Lusers.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
