The problem is certainly in version 3.0.3. In version 3.0.2 this problem does not happen.
John, I'm sure the problem is not in the database. The job that I perform, the bacula-dir shows me running, but not running on the bacula-sd and not in the bacula-fd too. John Drescher escreveu: > On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 11:55 AM, Gustavo Nunes Freire Ribeiro > <gust...@linconet.com.br> wrote: > >> Hello Mehma, >> >> I've done these 2 tests: >> >> I commented out messages section and still going the same problem. Guilt >> bstmp's really not because I am not using it. >> >> I had restarted the bacula-dir after running the first job and it runs >> the first job, when I run the second job it >> simply stop. When I ask the status of the bacula-dir, it shows that the >> job is running, but when I check in bacula-sd and bacula-fd does not >> there is no job running. Sorry my english =) >> >> > > How long have you waited? Was there activity on the database server? A > job will end on the FD side but still be running on the director for > sometimes several minutes. The reason is it may take a long time to > despool the database entries. > > John > > -- Gustavo N. F. Ribeiro Analista de Redes LINCONET Soluções em Informática LTDA +55 84 9996-3582 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
