On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 5:38 PM, Richard Scobie <rich...@sauce.co.nz> wrote: > I have just added 10 unlabeled, barcoded tape to a library that contains > 10 labeled, barcoded tapes. > > From the bat application, I have issued the following commands: > > update slots > > label barcodes > > At this point the bat console shows a list of the tapes that will be > labelled, but this includes the 10 tapes that already have labels. > > Is it really going to relabel these?
No > > Also, in this scenario, are the tapes labeled in ascending slot order or > ascending barcode order? The latter. > > I notice that bacula chooses empty appendable tapes to write to based on > the time they were labeled and I would prefer that they are used in > ascending barcode order. > > Regards, > > Richard > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint > What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G phone? > Visit sprint.com/first -- http://p.sf.net/sfu/sprint-com-first > _______________________________________________ > Bacula-users mailing list > Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users > -- John M. Drescher ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G phone? Visit sprint.com/first -- http://p.sf.net/sfu/sprint-com-first _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
