It's written initially, but the next job you run it will purge the Volume
because it thinks there are no jobs associated with it.
The job is still in list jobs (#18 here was the one that was purged when #19
was run):
*list jobs
+-------+-------------------+---------------------+------+-------+----------+-------------+-----------+
| JobId | Name | StartTime | Type | Level | JobFiles
| JobBytes | JobStatus |
+-------+-------------------+---------------------+------+-------+----------+-------------+-----------+
| 17 | company-services-01 | 2011-05-06 14:23:12 | B | F |
28,864 | 443,784,659 | T |
| 18 | company-services-01 | 2011-05-06 14:31:02 | B | I |
0 | 443,784,659 | T |
| 19 | company-services-01 | 2011-05-06 14:31:52 | B | I |
0 | 443,784,659 | T |
+-------+-------------------+---------------------+------+-------+----------+-------------+-----------+
But had its volume pruned:
6-May 14:31 company-services-01-dir JobId 19: Start Backup JobId 19,
Job=company-services-01.2011-05-06_14.31.50_07
06-May 14:31 company-services-01-dir JobId 19: There are no more Jobs
associated with Volume
"company-services-01-fd-company-services-01.2011-05-06_14.31.00_06-Incremental".
Marking it purged.
06-May 14:31 company-services-01-dir JobId 19: All records pruned from
Volume
"company-services-01-fd-company-services-01.2011-05-06_14.31.00_06-Incremental";
marking it "Purged"
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 2:13 PM, Martin Simmons <mar...@lispworks.com> wrote:
> >>>>> On Thu, 5 May 2011 16:20:11 -0400, Kevin O'Connor said:
> >
> > It looks like when a particular job is run and there were no changes
> > recorded, it purges the Volume. Is this the desired behavior? Should it
> > mark a Volume as such just because there were no recorded changes? I'd
> > think you'd just keep the Volume and just keep it marked as Used. A
> SELECT
> > * FROM File WHERE JobId = '54' returns no results, that was the last job
> run
> > before the entries pasted below showed up, this is expected though as
> this
> > was an incremental and no files were changed.
>
> That sounds like a bug to me. An empty job should still be written to the
> media.
>
> Is the job still in the output of "list jobs"?
>
> __Martin
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> WhatsUp Gold - Download Free Network Management Software
> The most intuitive, comprehensive, and cost-effective network
> management toolset available today. Delivers lowest initial
> acquisition cost and overall TCO of any competing solution.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/whatsupgold-sd
> _______________________________________________
> Bacula-users mailing list
> Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WhatsUp Gold - Download Free Network Management Software
The most intuitive, comprehensive, and cost-effective network
management toolset available today. Delivers lowest initial
acquisition cost and overall TCO of any competing solution.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/whatsupgold-sd
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
