On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 10:09:56AM -0400, Phil Stracchino wrote: > should I use for my tables?" is MyISAM.[1] At this point, wherever > possible, EVERYONE should be using InnoDB.
I will, if the current backup ever finishes. For a start on MySQL 5.1 though (Debian squeeze). I am aware InnoDB has a more stable performance according to the posts I have found in various bacula-mysql related posts. Your post gives me some hope I can get away with converting the table format instead of migrating to postgres. Simple for the fact I have nicer backup scripts for mysql than for postgres. > your MySQL configuration using MySQLtuner (free download from > http://mysqltuner.com/mysqltuner.pl; requires Perl, DBI.pm, and DBD::mysql.) I am using that one and tuning-primer.sh from http://www.day32.com/MySQL/ Regards, Adrian -- LiHAS - Adrian Reyer - Hessenwiesenstraße 10 - D-70565 Stuttgart Fon: +49 (7 11) 78 28 50 90 - Fax: +49 (7 11) 78 28 50 91 Mail: li...@lihas.de - Web: http://lihas.de Linux, Netzwerke, Consulting & Support - USt-ID: DE 227 816 626 Stuttgart ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable. Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c2 _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
