Hi Harry, On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 01:38:52PM +0200, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote: > of a average transfer rate of 65MB/s makes me worrying about massive > repositioning.
AFAIK LTO-Drives have adaptive speeds compared to older technologies. If
the data comes in slower, the drive will just run slower on a somewhat
constant speed. No more stop-and-go.
> Can I optimize my setup so that there won't be so many new files written
> on tape? Or should the creation of a new file mark been done without
> interruption of the transfer, and there's something wrong with my setup?
Do you use 'Spool Data = yes'?
To my understanding you can run multiple jobs to storage the same time,
but they end up interleaved. Spooling the data will write full jobs or
at least bigger chunks of a job in one run.
Regards,
Adrian
--
LiHAS - Adrian Reyer - Hessenwiesenstraße 10 - D-70565 Stuttgart
Fon: +49 (7 11) 78 28 50 90 - Fax: +49 (7 11) 78 28 50 91
Mail: li...@lihas.de - Web: http://lihas.de
Linux, Netzwerke, Consulting & Support - USt-ID: DE 227 816 626 Stuttgart
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable. Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c2
_______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
