Do you think if I tuning databases with : http://www.newitperson.com/2011/01/reduce-bacula-dbcheck-time/ CREATE INDEX File_JobId_idx ON File(JobId); CREATE INDEX File_PathId_idx ON File(PathId); CREATE INDEX File_FilenameId_idx ON File(FilenameId); CREATE INDEX Path_PathId_idx ON Path(PathId); CREATE INDEX Job_FileSetId_idx ON Job(FileSetId); CREATE INDEX Job_ClientId_idx ON Job(ClientId); CREATE INDEX File_FilenameIdPathId_idx ON File(FilenameId,PathId);
Or with : http://www.bacula.org/manuals/en/catalog/catalog/Catalog_Maintenance.html#SECTION00291000000000000000 CREATE INDEX file_jobid_idx on file (jobid); CREATE INDEX file_jpf_idx on file (jobid, pathid, filenameid); it will be faster? Le 6 avril 2012 18:10, John Drescher <dresche...@gmail.com> a écrit : > > I have a bacual-dir with ~250 clients. And each client has its own > catalog. > > > > When bacula-dir start, bacula-dir checks each database (~10s per client = > > ~45 minutes !!!) > > Meanwhile, the director is not accessible... > > > > How can I bypass that or reduce that ? > > > > I would try speeding up your database server perhaps by putting the > databases on an SSD or an array of them or at minimum a RAID10 of fast > harddrives. > > John >
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ For Developers, A Lot Can Happen In A Second. Boundary is the first to Know...and Tell You. Monitor Your Applications in Ultra-Fine Resolution. Try it FREE! http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-d2dvs2
_______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
