Hello,
2014-05-23 16:37 GMT+02:00 Dmitri Maziuk <dmaz...@bmrb.wisc.edu>:
> On 5/23/2014 8:35 AM, Radosław Korzeniewski wrote:
> > My suggestion was a very simple. Do not install/configure another
> > bacula-fd but simply and clever use existing configuration. In my case
> > it is a change of 4 parameters and adding a new client definition - your
> > require a lot more.
>
> FWIW I failed to get that to work back when I was playing with it, don't
> remember why. I ended up with what Josh suggests: as 2nd bacula-fd
> started by pacemaker and *listening on another port* because fd won't
> bind to eth0.0:9102 when eth0:9102 is already taken.
>
Both solutions will work fine. You are free to choose the best for you.
I've deployed a lot of clusters with bacula-fd using both solutions
depending on customer requirements.
During my deployments, I've found that setup of dedicated bacula-fd for
cluster service takes a lot of time compared to the simple solution, which
takes 2-3 minutes including testing. :)
best regards
--
Radosław Korzeniewski
rados...@korzeniewski.net
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automated Cross-Browser Testing - For FREE
Instantly run your Selenium tests across 300+ browser/OS combos.
Get unparalleled scalability from the best Selenium testing platform available
Simple to use. Nothing to install. Get started now for free."
http://p.sf.net/sfu/SauceLabs
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
