+1

> -----Original Message-----
> From: dweimer [mailto:dwei...@dweimer.net]
> Sent: Friday, June 05, 2015 11:37 AM
> To: Dimitri Maziuk
> Cc: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Perl 5.20 upgrade breaks
> make_catalog_backup.pl?
> 
> On 06/05/2015 12:20 pm, Dimitri Maziuk wrote:
> > On 06/05/2015 11:17 AM, Doug Sampson wrote:
> >>>
> >>> I have been running 5.20 for some time, it did break the script, but
> >>> the
> >>> fix was rather simple, probably should have posted something to a
> >>> mailing list so that it was fixed by now.
> >>>
> >>> in /usr/local/share/bacula/make_catalog_backup.pl I just changed the
> >>> first line from:
> >>> #!/usr/bin/env perl
> >>>
> >>> to:
> >>> #!/usr/bin/env /usr/local/bin/perl
> >>
> >> Ah, that did it! Thanks! Wish I knew about this sooner! :)
> >
> > The reason you didn't is it defeats the purpose of using env in shebang
> > line so nobody who actually understands what they're doing would ever
> > think of it.
> >
> 
> which is true, I don't know what I am doing, yes the point of the
> #!/usr/bin/env perl is to then find the first perl in the users path,
> and the above probably should have been stated as a quick work around.
> The true fix would be to determine why /usr/local/bin isn't found in the
> path in the user context in which it is ran under the job and correct
> that.
> You will find that even if the change isn't made the script runs
> perfectly fine from the command line.
> 
> --
> Thanks,
>     Dean E. Weimer
>     http://www.dweimer.net/
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ----
> _______________________________________________
> Bacula-users mailing list
> Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

Reply via email to