Hi Simone, Thank you for the info! That's great!
-craig On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 10:33 PM, Simone Caronni <negativ...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > > On 4 August 2015 at 03:37, Craig Shiroma <shiroma.crai...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Many (if not all) have the permissions srw-rw-rw- on the object. With >> bacula_t set to permissive, the errors don't seem to occur. Besides the >> restore problem which I can get around and the one above, are there any >> other problems with leaving bacula_t enforced? Is the problem above >> something to be worried about? I rather leave bacula_t enforced if >> possible (unless it is not recommended). >> > > I've been running Bacula with SELinux in enforcing mode for a few years > now and did not have any issue. Error on sockets are not a problem, you can > ignore those. They are created when the program starts. > > Regards, > --Simone > > > > > -- > You cannot discover new oceans unless you have the courage to lose sight > of the shore (R. W. Emerson). > > http://xkcd.com/229/ > http://negativo17.org/ >
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
