Hello Florian, Could you give more details about what versions of Bacula, Ubuntu and Windows are using??
If you build bacula from source, you will just need to rebuild including the --with-openssl option and then make the necessary configurations in your director and file daemon files. All your configurations files will be kept. This should cause no impact in your actual configuration. Best regards, Ana Em sex, 14 de ago de 2015 às 05:47, Florian Splett <florian.spl...@web.de> escreveu: > Hello. > > I have a working installation of bacula that takes care of the backups > in a small network. > When I first started with bacula and learned how to set it up, I had a > lot of trouble with including openssl, so I decided to build bacula > without it. > > Now we want to prepare for storing backups off-site, meaning encryption > becomes highly important. > > Here a short overview of the situation: > Ubuntu Server with Director, SD, catalog on postgresql and FD > 3 Windows machines with FD > 1 Synology NAS as SD target (accessed via mount) > > new: 1 Synology NAS off-site planned as additional SD target (maybe for > a second SD, not sure yet.) > > How can I add encryption support to my existing bacula installation? > Is a rebuild needed? If yes, does it have an impact on the existing > configurations? > > Regards, > > Florian S. > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > _______________________________________________ > Bacula-users mailing list > Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users >
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
