On 15.08.2015 17:44, Josip Deanovic wrote: > On Saturday 2015-08-15 12:15:13 Kern Sibbald wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I also think this may be a selinux problem. The best way to know is if >> Jing understands kernel and selinux logs, he can see if there are any >> selinux rejections, since they will not clearly show as being a selinux >> problem in the Bacula messages (the OS does not furnish this info). >> Another way, is to simply turn selinux off temporarily. If I am not >> mistaken, selinux is enabled by default on newer RedHat/CentOS systems. >> >> Best regards, >> Kern > RedHat/Centos are using selinux by default (6.x, 7.x, I don't remember > about 5.x any more) but the original poster said that he is using > archlinux. I have never used archlinux. > Good point.
Another thing, if I understand Jing correctly he believes that the owner:group of the binary imply what "user" the FD will be running as. Hopefully someone help him understand that the user:group that the binary that is executing is determined by the user:group of who started the binary and what command line options were used and not by the user:group of the binary image. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
