We're new to Bacula and are still considering if it's viable for us.
Our test environment is quite small (it is a test environment) and when I read
the docs I'm not sure how recent they are when they relate to hardware specs.
For example if I were to suggest box with dual 8 core E5 CPUs, hardware PERC
RAID card with 1GB cache, 48TB of 7.2k SATA in RAID6 and 32GB (or more) of RAM
running as a SD would people be thinking "hmmm may need more horsepower" or
would people be thinking "that should handle hundred/thousands of clients"?
Director could be on the same physical box but would ideally be a VM with a
couple of CPU cores and as much RAM as is needed to handle a couple dozen
clients, though the largest two clients are around 10TB and each have millions
of files.
Impression I get is that network and disk will be a bottleneck way before RAM
and CPU should be?
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance
APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month
Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now
Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=272487151&iu=/4140
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
