Dimitri, I am thinking of changing the mount to iscsi which looks as if it is 
more reliable than nfs. 
Here is the mount -v 
my.nfs.share:/home/backuppc/ToBackup on /home/backuppc/ToBackup type nfs 
(rw,noatime,vers=3,rsize=8192,wsize=8192,namlen=255,hard,nolock,proto=tcp,timeo=14,retrans=2,sec=sys,mountaddr=10.6.77.220,mountvers=3,mountport=20048,mountproto=tcp,local_lock=all,addr=10.6.77.220,_netdev)
 
regards 
Francis 

From: "Dimitri Maziuk" <[email protected]> 
To: "themetman" <[email protected]> 
Cc: "Bacula-users" <[email protected]> 
Sent: Thursday, 3 November, 2016 18:26:34 
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Permissions problem backing up to NFS Share 

On 11/03/2016 01:17 PM, Francis The Metman wrote: 
> Sorry just sent this from the wrong Email 
> Thanks, Dimitri, I added the 'all_squash' on the server side, reloaded the 
> exports, but no good. 

Ermm, all_squash is the opposite of what you want. Sorry for not being 
clearer: all_squash is another thing that can result in "permission denied". 

> Perhaps you would be kind enough to recommend what these entries should be. 

I usually just put in "noatime". 

What does mount -v show? -- the other possibility is some nfs hickup got 
it remounted ro. 

-- 
Dimitri Maziuk 
Programmer/sysadmin 
BioMagResBank, UW-Madison -- http://www.bmrb.wisc.edu 
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Developer Access Program for Intel Xeon Phi Processors
Access to Intel Xeon Phi processor-based developer platforms.
With one year of Intel Parallel Studio XE.
Training and support from Colfax.
Order your platform today. http://sdm.link/xeonphi
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

Reply via email to