Hello Drew,

You mentioned Bareos in your email, but you are writing to a Bacula 
email list.  Are you using Bacula? If so, it is better not to mention 
Bareos.  If you are using Bareos, please use their email list; the 
products are different and we cannot help you here.

Best regards,
Kern

On 12/22/2016 03:31 PM, Drew Von Spreecken wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> I have run into an issue and am looking for input. I have a SAS tape
> autoloader with an IBM HH-LTO6 drive running the newest firmware.
> It is currently connected to a Adaptec 78165 HBA/Raid controller via SAS.
>
> The issue I am having is when I attempt to modify the block-size to
> anything over 256KB that BareOS writes to tape, it fails. To simplify
> troubleshooting I have opted to use a combination of btape and dd to
> test block-size adjustments.
>
>
> Each test I perform I rewind the tape, write EOF and rewind again. I'm
> not missing a step here, right? Should I be able to write to a tape in
> this way with a different block size if I've used it at a different
> (smaller) size before?
>
> I am querying the tape-drive in the autoloader directly, the autoloader
> should not be part of the problem.
>
> Writing at anything under and at 256Kb works fine but is slow.
>
> The output from tapeinfo is:
>
> tapeinfo -f /dev/nst0
> Product Type: Tape Drive
> Vendor ID: 'IBM     '
> Product ID: 'ULTRIUM-HH6     '
> Revision: 'G9P1'
> Attached Changer API: No
> SerialNumber: '10WT077984'
> MinBlock: 1
> MaxBlock: 8388608
> SCSI ID: 0
> SCSI LUN: 0
> Ready: yes
> BufferedMode: yes
> Medium Type: 0x68
> Density Code: 0x5a
> BlockSize: 0
> DataCompEnabled: no
> DataCompCapable: yes
> DataDeCompEnabled: yes
> CompType: 0xff
> DeCompType: 0xff
> Block Position: 5
> Partition 0 Remaining Kbytes: -1
> Partition 0 Size in Kbytes: -1
> ActivePartition: 0
> EarlyWarningSize: 0
> NumPartitions: 0
> MaxPartitions: 3
>
> As you can see the block size limit for the drive itself is ~8MB...
>
> Here is an output from mt:
>
> mt -f /dev/nst0 status
> SCSI 2 tape drive:
> File number=0, block number=0, partition=0.
> Tape block size 0 bytes. Density code 0x5a (no translation).
> Soft error count since last status=0
> General status bits on (41010000):
>    BOT ONLINE IM_REP_EN
>
> Here is an attempt to write at a 256K block:
>
> dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/nst0 bs=256k count=1
> 1+0 records in
> 1+0 records out
> 262144 bytes (262 kB) copied, 1.9402 s, 135 kB/s
>
> Here is the failure at 512K:
>
> dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/nst0 bs=512k count=1
> dd: error writing ‘/dev/nst0’: Device or resource busy
> 1+0 records in
> 0+0 records out
> 0 bytes (0 B) copied, 1.56954 s, 0.0 kB/s
>
>
> It will fail with anything over 256K, even 257K.
>
> There are no errors in my system logs.
>
> I suspect either I have a configuration error here or am missing
> something simple OR the Adaptec 78165 raid controller is limiting the
> block size before I write to tape. Adaptec support is unable to confirm
> this. Is there a way I can prove this or does anyone have any guidance
> on how to continue troubleshooting this issue?
>
> Thanks!
>
> --drewv
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Developer Access Program for Intel Xeon Phi Processors
> Access to Intel Xeon Phi processor-based developer platforms.
> With one year of Intel Parallel Studio XE.
> Training and support from Colfax.
> Order your platform today.http://sdm.link/intel
> _______________________________________________
> Bacula-users mailing list
> Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Developer Access Program for Intel Xeon Phi Processors
Access to Intel Xeon Phi processor-based developer platforms.
With one year of Intel Parallel Studio XE.
Training and support from Colfax.
Order your platform today.http://sdm.link/intel
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

Reply via email to