On 04/09/18 11:31, Kern Sibbald wrote: > On 04/02/2018 08:52 PM, dhofmeister wrote: >> what's "out there" for centos is bacula 5.2 and the current bacula version >> is 9.0.x. since the latest rpms are only fedora, is bacula 9 considered >> stable/production ready? > You will need to talk to RedHat about that problem. I am not very happy > with them releasing such an old version,
Honestly, this is an endemic problem with Red Hat. ...And yet then they leap headlong at unproven, misconceived projects like systemd. Ask me about kgcc in the *first* Red Hat 7.0 sometime. -- Phil Stracchino Babylon Communications ph...@caerllewys.net p...@co.ordinate.org Landline: +1.603.293.8485 Mobile: +1.603.998.6958 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
