In the message dated: Wed, 11 Apr 2018 06:25:43 -0700, The pithy ruminations from Stephen Thompson on [Re: [Bacula-users] can file retention be job rather than client based?] were: => => Thanks Kern. => => I think given the limited nature of his need, I may use a postrun script
+1 for this request. I've got what may be a similar environment -- one major Bacula "client" (ie., a floating VIP/hostname pointing to a fileserver) with ~150 jobs, ranging from KB to multi-TB. Varying retention periods per-job would be a tremendous enhancement. => to simply wipe database records out of band. => => Also if I did use multi-client definitions, I would need to use the same => pool as they all go to the same monthly tapes. Same here. Mark => => Stephen => -- Mark Bergman voice: 215-746-4061 mark.berg...@uphs.upenn.edu fax: 215-614-0266 http://www.med.upenn.edu/cbica/ IT Technical Director, Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics Department of Radiology University of Pennsylvania ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
