> On 24. Oct 2023, at 17:15, Phil Stracchino <ph...@caerllewys.net> wrote:
>
> On 10/24/23 10:59, Justin Case wrote:
>
> Disclaimer: My situation is a little different from yours, I'm doing
> disk-to-disk-to-removable-disk.
>
>
>> For tier 1: does it make sense to have different volumes for full jobs and
>> incr jobs? Does it make sense to have these volumes in seperate pools, or
>> full and incr together in a pool? Would you recommend having different pools
>> for different groups of jobs?
>
> I keep Full, Differential and Incremental jobs in separate Pools. That way I
> can purge job batches as they become obsolete on their own schedules and
> recover the space.
I realized that my fulls and incrementals have the same retention time, so I
made 1 pool for both.
I guess you are using X > Y months for fulls and Y > Z months fordifferentials
and Z months for incrementals?
>> For tier 2: here I wil use copy jobs. Since copy jobs really do not
>> differentiate full and incr backups, there will be full and incr copies
>> together in volumes. Would you recommend having different pools for
>> different groups of copy jobs?
>
> I use copy jobs, but I copy only FULL backups to removable disk. (The
> removable disk zpools are then exported, unmounted, and stored
> offline/airgapped.)
>
on second thought that could make more sense, as it allows for a longer
retention.
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
