Gzip typically has high compression at high CPU cost.
Lzo typically has lower compression, and lower CPU cost.
Zstd (if available for your version of Bacula) typically has the best of
both worlds.

Robert Gerber
402-237-8692
[email protected]

On Wed, Apr 29, 2026, 10:39 AM Andrew Watkins <[email protected]> wrote:

> Arno,
>
> Well I finally spotted the difference between the new and old systems.
>
> I said the old server was doing compression, but IT WAS NOT! So, as soon
> as I switch off compression on the new server I get better performance.
>
>   Rate:                   84648.1 KB/s
>   Software Compression:   None
>   Comm Line Compression:  13.4% 1.2:1
>
> I didn't spot it since the configuration files are the same and I used the
> same build setup on both platforms. For some reason the old Solaris server
> didn't set the compression on any client (clients have not been altered,
> except for passwords!). I don't see why since libz is available.
>
> So, I have good speeds now with NO compression, but I will look into later
> why GZIP (haven't tested LZO yet) really hits performance (Solaris client
> CPU is 95% idle during backup, so not a CPU problem.)
>
> Anyway, for now thanks,
>
> Andrew
> On 4/23/2026 3:25 PM, Arno Lehmann via Bacula-users wrote:
>
> Hi Andrew,
>
> just a very quick suggestion for now -- you could try disabling transport
> encryption and compression and see if you get better throughput.
>
> And one question about the change: Have you touched the client on the
> Solaris host or the configuration (beyond changing credentials for the
> DIR)?
>
> The reason I ask is that, as far as I recall, the openSSL and possibly
> compression libraries on Solaris may be just slow compared to other
> platforms.
>
> 'status client=<the-solaris-host-fd>' should give a bit of information
> about the client build in the header, and that may become interesting when
> we try to find out if the FD is potentially problematic.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Arno
>
> Am 23.04.2026 um 13:28 schrieb Andrew Watkins:
>
> Hello,
>
> Have a strange one here. I have moved to a new Bacula Server and the read
> performance for a Solaris client is 3 times as bad.
>
> All other clients (Windows, Linux) are good.
>
> Old setup:
>
> Solaris Bacula 13.04 Server (slow disks for spooling) LTO5 when backing up
> a Solaris file server I get:
>
>      iostat gives me about 100Ms
>      Bacula Backup report gives me ~ 54,664.4 KB/s
>
> New Setup:
>
> Ubuntu Bacula 13.04 Server (Fast disks for spooling) LTO9 when backup up
> save Solaris file server I get:
>
> iostat gives me about 30Ms
> Bacula Backup report gives me ~4,661.3 KB/s
>
> But other clients Windows & linux are report good rates.
>
> The conf files are near enough the same, so any ideas why Solaris is so
> slow when backup up to a Linux server?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Andrew
>
> --
> *****************************************************
> *****    Support Request [email protected]    *****
> *****************************************************
> * Andrew Watkins                                    *
> * Birkbeck, University of London                    *
> * Computing and Mathematical Sciences               *
> *
> https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=http%3a%2f%2fnotallmicrosoft.blogspot.com&c=E,1,ciyP5u8kQDn-3n1M4lyEC8NXTbHxpJJPqFHVwaSuB0nBvL0meeOunhGJSyiB7XGA7SgCcKpcNE0ZJCYdLWDtlKWoDcaPGj1PgnYzPba9re8NrNfSD6i7ldU,&typo=1
> *
> *****************************************************
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bacula-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
>
>
> --
> *****************************************************
> *****    Support Request to [email protected]    *****
> *****************************************************
> * Andrew Watkins                                    *
> * Birkbeck, University of London                    *
> * Computing and Mathematical Sciences               *
> * http://notallmicrosoft.blogspot.com               *
> *****************************************************
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bacula-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
>
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

Reply via email to