In a message dated 12/9/2004 10:40:18 PM Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
We believe that the simple habit of thinking about the implications of the Writings with the minimum of personal interpretation would eliminate a great share of the disagreements that afflict consultation in many communities, In other words the opinions of the Ruhi editors supersede the Scripture
itself?
__________________________________________________
You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Baha'i Studies is available through the following: Mail - mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu |
- Re: Ruhi, Prolonged Discussions Popeyesays
- Re: Ruhi, Prolonged Discussions Smaneck
- Re: Ruhi, Prolonged Discussions Mark A. Foster
- Re: Ruhi, Prolonged Discussions Popeyesays
- Re: Ruhi, Prolonged Discussions Michael Alcorn
- Re: Ruhi, Prolonged Discussions Mark A. Foster
- Re: Ruhi, Prolonged Discussions Smaneck
- RE: Ruhi, Prolonged Discussions Susan Maneck
- Re: Ruhi, Prolonged Discussions Michael Alcorn
- Re: Ruhi, Prolonged Discussions Popeyesays
- Re: Ruhi, Prolonged Discussions Smaneck